Articles and Updates

• Vasanth Rajasekaran , Biswadeep Chakravarty and Sanjeev Sambasivan - 03-09-2020

Our partner Vasanth Rajasekaran along with senior associate Biswadeep Chakravarty, and associate Sanjeev Sambasivan analyze the recent judgment of the High Court, Calcutta wherein the court dealt with the issue of concurrent jurisdiction and preferred that the pending winding-up petition of a company should be referred to the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

• Sawant Singh, Biswadeep Chakravarty, and Sanjeev Sambasivan - 02-09-2020

Sawant Singh, Biswadeep Chakravarty, and Sanjeev Sambasivan throw light on a recent decision of the Delhi High Court which held that the mandatory pre-deposit of the awarded amount under the MSME Act, 2006, does not apply to an award rendered by arbitrator/s appointed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

• Vasanth Rajasekaran and Reshma Ravipati - 01-09-2020

Our partner Vasanth Rajasekaran along with associate Reshma Ravipati discusses some of the most significant judgments rendered in relation to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in the second quarter of 2020.

• Vasanth Rajasekaran and Reshma Ravipati - 01-09-2020

In this article, our partner Vasanth Rajasekaran and associate Reshma Ravipati have discussed the impending challenge to provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 dealing with personal guarantee and bankruptcy, and it's implications for lenders.

• Vasanth Rajasekaran and Reshma Ravipati - 20-08-2020

Our partner Vasanth Rajasekaran and associate Reshma Ravipati discuss a recent judgment of the High Court of Calcutta which clarifies that courts in India have the power to issue anti-arbitration injunctions against foreign seated arbitrations.